Mrienke
The Minister would have to have made a legal and proper decision, knowing full well CAZ's response to ny decision. However, what may be a subject of debate is the tranparency of the decision making process and I do find it odd that it was mormal due process that CAZ was not aware of RIO's full submissions when they themselves were providing submissions. I would have thought CAZ would have a right of reply.
Both State and C/wlth decision making bodies tend to hide behind FOI. I believe the Minister would have discretion regarding CAZ's FOI request.
We'll know more soon.
MrienkeThe Minister would have to have made a legal and proper...
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 18 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)
Add CAZ (ASX) to my watchlist
 (20min delay)
|
|||||
|
Last
1.9¢ |
Change
0.000(0.00%) |
Mkt cap ! $8.764M | |||
| Open | High | Low | Value | Volume |
| 0.0¢ | 0.0¢ | 0.0¢ | $0 | 0 |
Buyers (Bids)
| No. | Vol. | Price($) |
|---|---|---|
| 2 | 85500 | 1.8¢ |
Sellers (Offers)
| Price($) | Vol. | No. |
|---|---|---|
| 1.9¢ | 250000 | 1 |
View Market Depth
| Last trade - 09.40am 02/07/2024 (20 minute delay) ? |
| CAZ (ASX) Chart |
Day chart unavailable