cc email response, page-7

cool- thumbs up then! Cheers for posting and now I know I can reply without fear of the whole thread being moderated :-).

Its good to hear his musings - all makes sense.

In relation to the Saracen comparison - their project looks like the rag-end of IGR's phase 2 project - in that they have multiple smaller pit sources, quite a lot at fairly low grades, and I suspect a lot of their resource estimates are based on historical drill results that haven't been QA's as well.

When you look through IGR's BFS there already appears to be quite a few years of additional resource available to throw into the mix over and above what has been included in phase 1 and 2 estimates - including additional salt creek ore as well as the potential underground continuations of the BIF's at Maxwells and other underground potential. Then of course lucky bay etc. that also haven't been included yet. And thats without any new discoveries.

It just shows the depth/quality of what IGR is sitting on compared to others.