Hi KIWI67, I am posting this link to the 22-Dec-2015 one because...

Hi KIWI67, I am posting this link to the 22-Dec-2015 one because I think it gives a better picture of what is going on with the assets and mentions Jane Flegg.

I wonder why Jane Flegg gets a mention? It’s a rhetorical question, although it could open a debate, I am not sure how far the conversation could go.

“4. Except as authorised by the Orders made on 7 and 14 December 2015 and by Order 5 below, nothing in these Orders permits the payment of any monies from the sale of the Properties or the Lexus to be paid to:

1. the First Defendant;
2. the First Defendant’s Wife;
3. the Second Defendant;
4. the Third Defendant;
5. Jane Flegg; and/or
6. any other entity or associate related to any of the aforementioned.”

https://www.comcourts.gov.au/file/Federal/P/WAD717/2015/3743670/event/28351564/document/686628