how about knowingly presenting false or tainted evidence (the standing committee report) in the case against Xstrata in NSW. If the court relied on the report in making its judgement, I think Xstrata would be entitled to kick up a fuss.
Also, just when were the PMA director(s) leaked the decision of the standing committee, and did they breach any insider trading before the standing committee report was made public?
PMA
precious metals australia limited
