how about knowingly presenting false or tainted evidence (the standing committee report) in the case against Xstrata in NSW. If the court relied on the report in making its judgement, I think Xstrata would be entitled to kick up a fuss.
Also, just when were the PMA director(s) leaked the decision of the standing committee, and did they breach any insider trading before the standing committee report was made public?
- Forums
- ASX - By Stock
- ccc
PMA
precious metals australia limited
how about knowingly presenting false or tainted evidence (the...
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 17 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)