So none of this is the fault of the FDA?
Well you concede it could be, if only in part and THEN you forget it in the next breath.
Try to be more fair-minded. Because you still are not.
You were aware of SI's goals. Yet only now you think he should have gone for something else.
But the FDA KNOW they have been messing up, the article in Endpoints makes it clear.
You are above referring to it or the implications....why? Because the article didn't come from you?
Clearly you think that having a speciality in clinical trials means you don't have to even try to understand the policy points I'm making nor engage with them.
There is no need to be so elitist about it all... the mark of an educated person is to recognise what they don't know. And nobody can know everything.
I've had to engage with medical specialists like you who ignore ignore ignore, and then pivot to pretend it was all their idea all along to pivot regardless of impact on the patient. One said not to email her an article a key point she was ignoring continually up to the pivot point, despite signals being shown dismissing indications and refusing to do a proper examination. So don't send it to me, and THEN asked me for the details so she could write it down. She wants it to look like it's all her research. The EGO is enormous.
She has been getting it wrong for years but only now is realising and absolutely point blank refuses to admit, because she is all about protecting her precious image. This is professional arrogance, I'm quite familiar with it.
It's been brutal in here and you continue to be brutal about SI. Fortunately the Board will not be listening to you and I imagine some ultimatums might have already been issued in relation to that by other parties with even less understanding than you about the policy balance on this.
Constantly you act like you have nothing to learn from me nor anyone else who hasn't got your particular brand of expertise.
This is a general discussion board and not an elite forum. Yet knowing this you decide to make it into whatever you like. Knowing it's offtopic, you continue like you are above the fray.
The number of followers or TUs you have is not indicative of merit, certainly not in this environment.
PS Try to get my handle right, you carelessly call me @DV and @dolcevida and expect those to work.
Also try to focus on the positives because you are forgetting them.
- Forums
- ASX - By Stock
- CEO Itescu needs to go
So none of this is the fault of the FDA?Well you concede it...
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 78 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)
Featured News
Add MSB (ASX) to my watchlist
|
|||||
Last
$1.01 |
Change
0.030(3.06%) |
Mkt cap ! $1.153B |
Open | High | Low | Value | Volume |
$1.01 | $1.04 | 99.0¢ | $5.111M | 5.050M |
Buyers (Bids)
No. | Vol. | Price($) |
---|---|---|
2 | 211966 | $1.01 |
Sellers (Offers)
Price($) | Vol. | No. |
---|---|---|
$1.02 | 136540 | 9 |
View Market Depth
No. | Vol. | Price($) |
---|---|---|
1 | 48333 | 1.005 |
3 | 49000 | 1.000 |
3 | 80800 | 0.995 |
5 | 129515 | 0.990 |
1 | 3300 | 0.985 |
Price($) | Vol. | No. |
---|---|---|
1.020 | 136540 | 9 |
1.025 | 63000 | 3 |
1.030 | 28077 | 3 |
1.040 | 27850 | 2 |
1.045 | 103431 | 6 |
Last trade - 16.10pm 16/08/2024 (20 minute delay) ? |
Featured News
MSB (ASX) Chart |