I think we can take it as read at this point that you don't...

I think we can take it as read at this point that you don't think non-holders should critique this stock, you don't have to post about it all the time. As a novelty, have you thought about making some substantive refutation of any point that FLN bears are making?

I'll give you a few starter ideas in the unlikely event you feel like making a post with some content:

"Actually, it's good that MB posts the equivalent of a novel worth of online Medium rants, since ..."

"While some might claim that a company that's making the same revenue as it did 8 years ago isn't growing, they are missing the fact that ..."

"Anyone criticizing FLN's balance sheet for not having assets to cover its user account liabilities, unlike UPWK and FVRR, is wrong since ..."