So that article is talking badly about a guy named Adler, then...

So that article is talking badly about a guy named Adler, then you felt the need (with 6 posts under your belt) to associate this with the CEO of Simon Kantor because he worked with him?

Seriously, the amount of down-ramping over the weekend wouldn't bother me if they actually had substance, but this is getting ridiculous.

You say you're not trying to down-ramp but say things like "my sentiments may have changed" because of an article that shows he worked with someone who was a crook certainly implies a down-ramp.

I'm sure everyone who worked with Jordan Belfort is also a big time criminal /sarcasm