Not sure I would interpret the letter in that way (e.g. LLC not voting)
LLC has 43.23%
Non-LLC holders have 56.77%
According to the corporations law, 75% is required for the motion to pass.
Therefore, another 32% of total holders vote is required from the non-LLC holders. E.g. 32% of 57% non-LLC votes is required, (which is 56%) and it is still a majority of non-LLC votes. I am pretty sure this is what "requisite majority on the non-Len Lease LLP Securityholders" means in the letter.
Top 20 holders inc LLC control 62.45% of the vote
The Top 19 ex LLC control around 19.22%.
Small holders control 37.55%.
If all small holders vote agains, the vote will not pass. Realistically, of course, it will be determined by 19.22% of top 19 non-LLC holders, which are mostly funds. Citicorp-associated entities have 7% so it must hold a fair chunk of the bargaining power.
- Forums
- ASX - By Stock
- LLP
- chairman's letter - nothing new
chairman's letter - nothing new, page-13
-
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 1 more message in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)
Featured News
Add LLP (ASX) to my watchlist
Currently unlisted public company.
The Watchlist
SER
STRATEGIC ENERGY RESOURCES LIMITED
David DeTata, Managing Director
David DeTata
Managing Director
SPONSORED BY The Market Online