challenge to deacan and friends., page-3

Redfaces, judging by your posts, since you, deacan and others are keen to look after us investors we are quite happy for you to take up with Roger's whatever is within your capabilities (don't worry about the things that you don't understand - we are more than happy to wait for DEACAN to come back to address those curly issues on our behalf.

As in your post, you conveyed that you would be happy to "take up the challenge" yourself, we would be delighted if you could take up the following (taken from your post) with Rogers for us - and anything else that concerns you about the company and is within you understanding.

YOUR QUOTE:
"I do reckon that there is ANOTHER question I would
like to take up with Rogers however. I spoke to the
big guy a few weeks back and he told me all about how
he had only gotten involved in the company becuase
Frazer begged him to take it on.
Imagine my surprise when I made a more detailed study
of the chronology and it looks as though Rogers
stepped onto the board BEFORE Frazer put his hand up
to help out.
To me - the situation STINKS"

Many thanks for coming up to the plate to assist us investors during DEACAN's absence and we look forward Roger's response to your email. Of course, we also look forward tot DEACON taking up the challenge on his return.

Redfaces, I must say that I am a little dissapointed that you have been the only one so far to volunteer to take up issues with Roger's. I thought that a few others would have come forward.
Thanks again