Nothing is wrong with using that phrase redux.
But two things come to mind.
1. Are all other models used in AGW discussions less sophisticated?
2. If not, why isn't modelled outcomes even remotely coming close to observed quality controlled or homogenised data.
Yes Yes i know. I am not a scientist. I will never understand why modelled information cannot resemble observed data and be deemed normal.
God knows what i am missing here.
Have to make time and get to other thread and respond to that nonsense.
