Chart thread, page-1128

Well now I feel compelled to argue Trump's case as attitudes and perspectives like yours do really puzzle me. Why would it ever, in any world, be okay for countries to tarrif international imports (including American), but not expect to be tarrif'd in return? I really don't understand how anyone can justify the previous world order and criticise Trump putting America first (for once). ps: I'm not American.

Either there's a real (toxic) left lean to a good majority of people in this world who forgot all about darwinism, competition and general progression, or I'm just so far right now that I have zero empathy left.

For the record, I also find it AMAZING that everyone has an opinion on Trump's behaviour EVEN THOUGH they have no access to the facts, data and numbers that he sees. Put simply: do we trust a billionaire businessman or do we all think that we know better, sat there behind our keyboard like good little warriors.

re: AML3D - as I've said before: all countries are increasing spending. America has openly said recently that they've fallen well behind with submarines and naval powers and the only reason they'd leave AUKUS is due to them increasing their own spending, see this article: https://www.telegraph.co.uk/business/2025/03/07/nato-in-tatters-britain-security-pact-australia-next/

If it's behind a paywall, here's the relevant piece:



And further, this:




To summarise:

UK, US and AUS all need more submarines and they need them fast. This to me spells positive news for a quick, efficient builder of parts, like AML3D.

Being in the US with the Ohio operation means more favourable terms.