“Maybe instead of worrying about manipulation you should be asking why no funds/institutions are taking the chance to accumulate a large position in this.”
I have not previously raised market manipulation, my coverage here (despite your comment) was merely to defend the view of another member who I thought had a raised a plausible view.
But to answer your question, have you seen the top 20 holders of Panoramic that make up about 70% of the holding. Ausbil, UBS, Citi, IGO, Zeta, National, BNP Paribas, JPMorgan, HSBC to name a few. Contrary to your comment here, these entities have large positions.
You do not want max institutional holding as it may create a liquidity problem - The low volumes presently are also demonstrating this theory using the top 20 ownership.
I hear you for the most part and will look to check out the book you suggested but seriously… You honestly suggesting there is no market manipulation/ suppression that occurs in the stock market at all? Not even a probability of say 5%?
Broadly speaking, would you not also consider bear/ bull traps as a form of market manipulation? This occurs all the time and if I am not mistaken you have even directly referenced these said traps which would assume that you are aware (fundamentally) that manipulation does occur in the stock market.
- Forums
- ASX - By Stock
- Chart thread
“Maybe instead of worrying about manipulation you should be...
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 792 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)
Featured News
Add PAN (ASX) to my watchlist
(20min delay)
|
|||||
Last
3.5¢ |
Change
0.000(0.00%) |
Mkt cap ! $103.9M |
Open | High | Low | Value | Volume |
0.0¢ | 0.0¢ | 0.0¢ | $0 | 0 |
Featured News
PAN (ASX) Chart |
Day chart unavailable