Chart thread, page-88

First 88 Last

Share
Profile

Follow
RocksRule

1,099 Posts.

149

07/01/22

09:46

Post #: 58697765
Share

Originally posted by entropylord: ↑

Agree, plus if John would remember any current discount is to the price that they were not prepared to pay two years ago, after doing their due diligence. And no one else was either.

I would expect that if they wrap up WSA they will be even less inclined to bid for PAN, as they will have achieved the continuity of their nickel business they so desperately needed and sought, and quite a few optionalities including for downstream processing.

Of course PAN might still be quite attractive to them. PAN produces quite a low nickel content concentrate, which has high transportation costs and won’t be getting the best of payabilities. Recovery is not so flash either. Perhaps IGO’s process is able to add quite a bit of value, though probably no more than it would’ve two years ago.

I am just happy to see my small holding get close to being in the money again. I suspect we are fairly fully valued now, but then with cashflow now we are fairly well derisked after a horrible restart.

EL

Expand

You don't think IGO are interested in PAN? Have a look at the map below (from IGO website). IGO are nickel focussed in the Kimberleys, and who owns the only sulfide concentrator and operating nickel mine in amongst their tenement portfolio. Bit of a no-brainer really, even more so after inheriting the WSA shareholding in PAN.

PAN Price at posting: 29.5¢ Sentiment: Hold Disclosure: Held
5 Upvote

1 Great analysis

Reply

Top Stories

Week 44 Wrap: Relatively boring week ahead of US election; HotCopper's most watched; Oz inflation at 3.5%

MIN

Ellison slapped with $20M sanction from MinRes but will stay on as leader – for now

MIN

Movers and Shakers: Zip Co, MinRes, Kuniko, more – The week's top ASX gainers

Bitcoin hits fresh record as instos pile into BTC ETFs – and Trump helps, too

Palladium's the newest geopolitical hot commodity. But ASX exposure is limited