itinerant posted: "Also keep in mind that non-dilutive financing is a two-sided sword since it brings with it a debt (and interest) burden."
itinerant
this point is always raised against the option of going for 100% debt.
my intstictive thoughts (which have NOT been not financially scrutinised) are that if you will have a healthy cashflow positive business including repayment of debt/interest then surely you want to retain the largest possible stake in that business by avoiding any significant dilution?
if you can put up a sound business case for 100% debt, and the banks will wear it, then surely this is the way to go?
i would prefer to hedge future production at a discount to the current gold price, if this is indeed required to get the finance, than to dilute the shareholders base with weak nands that will bail out for a quick 10% or 20% profit after their discounted placement ...
k
- Forums
- ASX - By Stock
- chart
itinerant posted: "Also keep in mind that non-dilutive financing...
-
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 35 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)
Add YTC (ASX) to my watchlist
Currently unlisted public company.
The Watchlist
SER
STRATEGIC ENERGY RESOURCES LIMITED
David DeTata, Managing Director
David DeTata
Managing Director
SPONSORED BY The Market Online