What is worst is if the board knew they were that underthey...

What is worst is if the board knew they were that under
they should have been delisted to avoid the public from
losing and privatise it but they seem to make a decision to treat it as a gambling stock. theres private ownership 15% GM, 1%, 40%, 5%, 5%, 5%
whats left is public retailer holders approx 20 - 30%
But we are used for capitalization funding to pay their wages and store lease rentals.

Their board members
You have one ex partner of a law firm whom BBG uses and is also a director of a the super retail group which includes sporting brands and rebel retail!
Why does this brand uses people from other competing brands that can affect the decision making. Where do these people get the time to sit on multiple boards and get away with millions!
Why should any of us lose anything if not the most is $550
instead of 50K 28K 10K they use the trick of discounting so it pulls people in, once they get in, it disappears then when they buy it cheap they resell it, then the process repeats! U have to be in it to know what it does, these guys are so loyal BBG is getting away with it year on.

Even worst they print shares like money printing.
they hand out shares to their directors on their performances. THEY SHOULD BE BUYING IT AS DIRECTORS SO THEY
CAN FEEL THEIR LOSSES LIKE WE DO!

ME I BITE!