PAR 0.00% 20.0¢ paradigm biopharmaceuticals limited..

This is the article from The Australian on the weekend on our...

  1. 817 Posts.
    lightbulb Created with Sketch. 379

    This is the article from The Australian on the weekend on our old little favorite Humira........

    Docs use rubber stamp for US drugs’


    EXCLUSIVE NATASHA ROBINSON HEALTH EDITOR

    Pharmacists have raised the alarm over the influence of a US pharmaceutical
    corporation on Australian doctors who are signing trademark-stamped letters
    requesting their patients be given the company’s branded drugs rather than
    biosimilar medications that cost taxpayers less.
    Pharmacists around the country are reporting receiving proforma letters from
    specialist rheumatologists, gastroenterologists and public hospital clinics that have
    been supplied by the Illinois-based pharmaceutical company AbbVie to doctors
    instructing chemists to only dispense the branded version of the widely prescribed
    auto-immune medication adalimumab.
    The medication, Australia’s highest-grossing drug, is prescribed to 27,000
    Australians for conditions including rheumatoid arthritis, Chrohn’s disease and
    psoriasis. It has the brand name Humira but is off-patent and there are several
    biosimilar versions of the drug available on the Pharmaceutical Benefits Scheme.
    The influence campaign has been criticised by pharmacists as highly inappropriate.
    But doctors say there are good reasons they may want a patient to take only the
    branded medication and they do not want patients swapping between Humira and
    biosimilars.
    AbbVie has admitted supplying “information and resources” to specialists to be
    given to pharmacists requesting only the branded medication be dispensed, saying
    the provision of such letters by drug representatives to doctors to assist prescribing
    is common practice. It has also supplied stamps to doctors to be stamped onto
    scripts stating the doctor only authorises the prescription of the Humira brand.
    “Based on my clinical judgment and in consultation with my patient, I have
    prescribed Humira (adalimumab),” a letter supplied by AbbVie to doctors which has
    been signed in identical form by many specialists and given to pharmacists reads.
    “I have determined that brand substitution is not clinically appropriate for my
    patient and they should be treated with the Humira brand of medication. No other
    brand of adalimumab may be dispensed in place of Humira.”
    “These letters are definitely inappropriate, big time,” said Fady Fahmy, a pharmacist
    in Newcastle in NSW. “Reading the wording of the stamp and the letters, it’s really
    pushing the line. We understand that each company has the right to protect its
    product, but if you have been cashing in all these millions it’s too much to keep
    pushing it when the patent is gone and then anyone can manufacture it.”
    AbbVie has been the subject of a house oversight committee inquiry in the US which
    fingered the company for engaging in anticompetitive practices to block competition
    and inflate prices.
    The company said the materials were supplied to doctors to avoid confusion on
    medications.
    “AbbVie supports the ability for doctors to determine, in consultation with patients,
    which brand of medicine is prescribed and subsequently dispensed, and as part of
    our commitment to Quality Use of Medicines, we provide relevant information and
    resources to healthcare professionals to be used solely at their discretion,” the
    company said.
    The federal government has enacted legislation that ensure medicines are prescribed
    by their active ingredient rather than their brand, to support the uptake of generic
    and biosimilar medicines which cost the PBS less.
    Adam Rodger, a Queensland pharmacist, said he was surprised that doctors were
    signing off on the proforma letters.
    “These letters are not information and resources,” Mr Rodger said. “They are
    essentially creating forms and templates for people to act in the drug company’s best
    interests. How can that be the doctor’s exact professional opinion when it’s been
    written by somebody else?”
    Medical and patient groups say there are valid reasons why a prescribing physician
    may want their patient on the branded Humira rather than a biosimilar.
    Britt Christensen, the chair of the IBD faculty of the Gastroenterological Society of
    Australia, said doctors were not comfortable with patients switching back and forth
    between Humira and biosimilars. “Patients can go to different pharmacies and they
    could end up on four different types of medication,” she said.
    “We don’t know the safety of that, we don’t know whether they then lose response. If
    the patient loses response, that’s a disaster.”
    Susanna Proudman, the medical director of Arthritis Australia, said patients needed
    consistency.
    “I’ve never seen one of these letters before and I wouldn't be happy signing it myself,
    but I guess rheumatologists and consumers may argue the clinical decision about
    what drug is prescribed should be the drug that is dispensed – and if that is not
    happening, some form of correspondence is entered into that may be justified,” Dr
    Proudman said.

    ‘How can that be the doctor’s exact opinion when it’s been written by somebody
    else?

    ’ ADAM RODGER PHARMACIST
 
watchlist Created with Sketch. Add PAR (ASX) to my watchlist
arrow-down-2 Created with Sketch. arrow-down-2 Created with Sketch.