Hey Roo, whilst I very much agree with you in regards there being some boards/management teams that are.... not always aligned with what retail holders want, I really do feel in this case (that you are off the mark), that whilst
@Undaunted makes a solid case regarding the performance rights... he totally skips the fact that when most were proposed, Pepper was barely a discovery and Freak did not exist.... whilst I appreciate differing opinions, I also find the crafting of a narrative less impressive. Perhaps you don't play poker Undaunted? Players don't just flip their cards the second the game starts... they hold until the final moment.
@Prisoner24601 - Might be worth checking the credentials of the team before doubting their capabilities. Like you I have a substantial investment in SPR and I do not critique you for questioning the situation (I myself also continually re-assess the situation as I see it). While a potential 2 year period between production can seem long, some HC fold seem to think that..... SPR is more like... AUC - the deposit is basically finite, it's just about tweaking a few numbers and.... then it's just about building the plant. SPR is a totally different beast. It keeps discovering more U/G deposits, making the 'target for production' a moving target.
@Boolgeeda Dream - If you get a chance like I did to speak to Craig, you would likely have a different view about the SPR crew wanting to actually mine NN & Pepper.
@Oldgherkin - sorry, but you are very wrong IMHO, there is no greater professional than Craig.
I sincerely hope SPR finds a way of securing access to the most recent broker report that
@Joelstar alluded to, as it could go some way to illuminating investors as to just much more SPR has ahead of it.
Good luck to all holders (even the grumpy ones).
(20min delay)