At least you have to give me credit for not mentioning the FDA....

First 215 Last

Share
Profile

Follow
Lies&damnlies

2,962 Posts.

2149

06/04/24

14:07

Post #: 73219976
Share

Originally posted by longreach: ↑

Hi Lies,

Your comment:
"I think your suggesting that I shouldn't point out the various charting alternatives in my posts. But I thought that's what a charting thread is for."

No, I wasn't suggesting that at all. Not only myself, but other posters also have stated that your comments regarding certain general aspects of your past experiences with sharetrading, which relate more to fundamentals, and which in fact don't necessarily apply in the case of EBR, were reasons why you had doubts about EBR, despite this being a Charting thread.

Your comments about a "hypothetical" scenario of how you'd trade EBR under it falling a certain percentage etc in fact IMO was frivolous, and mocking EBR shareholders - I personally didn’t appreciate it, but decided to let it slip.

Similarly your comment "Getting the wife to hide your wallet for a while, may not be complete nonsense" may have been a joke but actually being of similar age to you (maybe older) I thought quite demeaning, but once again I let it slip.

If you still consider EBR's chart pattern remains a DCB, despite this sustained upward trend I suggest you take a look at any of the ASX200 stocks - from what i can see most would apply at some time in their trading history according to your view!

Because you are too busy following at least another half dozen stocks at the moment, and therefore haven't time for researching EBR, then why are you even looking and posting on EBR?

Expand

At least you have to give me credit for not mentioning the FDA. You have no idea of how hard that was.

I am not calling a DCB. I gave two alternatives. Lets see what plays out.

You right again, I have spent too much time hear.

I'll only return when one of the two alternatives provides a signal.

Bye

EBR Price at posting: 92.0¢ Sentiment: None Disclosure: Not Held
Upvote

0 Great analysis

Reply