If you're saying it's the same as LEX because it's sp has...

If you're saying it's the same as LEX because it's sp has dropped 60% in a few months then there are probably lots of other stocks that you can say are the same as LEX, so why didn't you include them also? In other words, congratulations on noticing a pattern but context is extremely important. Try and include some in your next post.

However, if you are implying the reason it has dropped 60% is the same as why Lex's SP dropped a similar amount, so you're suggesting that you've already provided context, then that's already been answered by dingo0 and you chose to ignore this in your most recent post.