chat with the company , page-8

Thanks qBen8,

You have done well. I think Q uestions 6 to 9 are the ones that answer all of the important questions.

The rollover of Sentient debt is critical, but i cannot see this not happening. How this occurs is the big question. Obviously, they are increasingly coming from a stronger position of power. For my mind, i think this is a positive. Sentient like the project obviously and want it to work. Sure, there is some dilution, but we are still up and running.

George Soros selling is not so good, but not a show stopper, particularly with sentient still on board.

The power station is an annoying delay, but should be just that - a delay. Share investors hate delays - thus the plummet in share price. With a solution, the share price can skyrocket back up.

Finally, Deans comment on is this a viable comapny was music to my ears. Obviously he meant it by your use of the word, unequivocally.

This is my only concern at any time. I can deal with share price drops, this happens. But if Dean thinks the company has good legs, thats great and enough to appease me.

I think there are some great people involved in this company - they have had to deal with some significant obstacles. Hopefully, one day we will have a laugh about it.

By the way, I was moderated not once but twice in the "DAY OF THE MODERATORS LONG KNIVES". I have no idea why, but will assume it had nothing to do with my posts, but one of you more reckless posters (to be honest, i cant even remember what i posted, but i do know there was nothing worth moderating). I dont think the company had anything to do with it. I didnt read anything defamatory and the moderator indicated flaming or baiting. The company has shown a thicker skin than this given some of the half baked posts over the years.

Im putting MRN in the top draw and letting the MRN team get on with the job.