ChatGPT version on global warming - unbiased, page-4

I disagree with your header that it's unbiased. I think it's very biased.

Basically it's learned opinions and some knowledge from human mutterings - and it will continue to learn by itself.

But as far as unbiased goes - if one looks at what it says (which is what many humans say) --

it basically says that - yes, there's a very high probability that human activity has caused much of or the current trend in 'global warming' -

it then goes on to say that it's important to take action to reduce greenhouse gas emissions --


well, in reality. We don't actually know for certain what is causing what - not with any exactitude - in fact - nowhere near any certainty.

many of us 'think' that Co2 might be a contributing factor - but, the reality is ------- it might be an effect, not a cause

it also uses the term 'global warming' - which is kind of interesting, that it didn't use 'climate change'

anyway ---------- I think it is biased.

I wonder what it would have answered if instead of asking ''"is it possible that global warming can have a natural cause?"

what might it have said if you asked "is it possible that climate change can have a natural cause?"

it would be also interesting to have asked it ''"is it possible that global cooling can have a natural cause?"

perhaps also "what effect does global dimming have on climate change?"