Interesting Finch. Mind you, the intangibles are unlikely to be 100% of the purchase price as in most cases there would be at least some tangibles included. however your theory makes sense.
I just did something similar, however working off the uplift in intangibles from Dec 2010 to Dec 2012 to get a feel for more recent purchases.
2010 was ebit $8M off intangibles $60M.
So $141M increase in intangibles would add $35M to ebit @ 25%.
If no other change, and $0 organic growth, half yearly should be $21.5M.
So, they're still 20% below where they should be as a minimum, with ni organic growth and assuming no tangibles. Hmmm.
Interesting Finch. Mind you, the intangibles are unlikely to be...
Add to My Watchlist
What is My Watchlist?
 (20min delay)
|
|||||
|
Last
$1.17 |
Change
0.010(0.87%) |
Mkt cap ! $895.0M | |||
| Open | High | Low | Value | Volume |
| $1.17 | $1.17 | $1.16 | $34.36K | 29.52K |
Buyers (Bids)
| No. | Vol. | Price($) |
|---|---|---|
| 28 | 32932 | $1.16 |
Sellers (Offers)
| Price($) | Vol. | No. |
|---|---|---|
| $1.17 | 12467 | 9 |
View Market Depth
| Last trade - 11.10am 24/06/2025 (20 minute delay) ? |
| GEM (ASX) Chart |