Interesting Finch. Mind you, the intangibles are unlikely to be 100% of the purchase price as in most cases there would be at least some tangibles included. however your theory makes sense.
I just did something similar, however working off the uplift in intangibles from Dec 2010 to Dec 2012 to get a feel for more recent purchases.
2010 was ebit $8M off intangibles $60M.
So $141M increase in intangibles would add $35M to ebit @ 25%.
If no other change, and $0 organic growth, half yearly should be $21.5M.
So, they're still 20% below where they should be as a minimum, with ni organic growth and assuming no tangibles. Hmmm.
Interesting Finch. Mind you, the intangibles are unlikely to be...
Add to My Watchlist
What is My Watchlist?
 (20min delay)
|
|||||
|
Last
$1.16 |
Change
-0.015(1.28%) |
Mkt cap ! $891.1M | |||
| Open | High | Low | Value | Volume |
| $1.17 | $1.17 | $1.16 | $680.7K | 588.0K |
Buyers (Bids)
| No. | Vol. | Price($) |
|---|---|---|
| 8 | 188454 | $1.15 |
Sellers (Offers)
| Price($) | Vol. | No. |
|---|---|---|
| $1.17 | 20488 | 2 |
View Market Depth
| Last trade - 16.11pm 23/06/2025 (20 minute delay) ? |
| GEM (ASX) Chart |