From the period immediately before the acquisition of MKY we...

From the period immediately before the acquisition of MKY we have observed an endless stream of information from cheerleaders of this stock. Some of whom have made their first appearance on HC at this time.

These posts continue to manipulate poor data and performance in an endeavour to paint a rosey picture. These posts continue to suggest the superior ability and performance of the management team when results clearly suggest otherwise.

One posting has suggested a shareholder has an association with ASIC. The innuendo here is as clear as it is inaccurate. If these managers are subjected to scrutiny by ASIC this shareholder will present no obstacle.

All contributors to this forum should consider the following. By registering a vote a particular posting receives a rating. The higher the rating the higher the position of that posting for the particular stock.

IS IT LOGICAL THAT A POSTING OF THIS NATURE RECEIVE SUCH A HIGH RATING FOR THIS STOCK CONSIDERING RECENT PERFORMANCE?
WHO STANDS TO GAIN FROM A POSTING OF THIS TYPE BEING THE FIRST POSTING VIEWED FOR THIS STOCK.

Statistics
Since the high immediately after the MKY acquisition the stock has fallen 48%
Since immediately before the acquisition the stock has fallen 36%
The volume traded since the acquisition is 18,770,277
The movement since the acquisition has been resoundingly negative.
These figures are clearly not a normal reaction between results. The volumes are not huge however they are high for this stock.

SO WHO HAS GAINED AND WHO HAS LOST AS A RESULT OF THE RECENT AQUISITION