In terms of showing/proving that FL can stand up against the neighbouring projects across the channel, take QCLNG for example. It'll be initially an 8.2mtpa project with room for expansion to 12mtpa. It's also costing $20.5billion (though admittedly that includes 100's of km's of pipeline). Now take a look at the FL site in comparison, and the $2odd billion it's going to cost to build the initial 4mtpa at Magnolia. If there's value in the company making a point, there's clear a strong point to quite easily be made.
