Why personally attack the poster rather than addressing the topic.
One has to conclude that you dont have a reasonable counter argument....eh?
IMO its reasonable to say that the projected $380 Billion for the Claytons Nuke Subs
(Nuclear propelled but not Nuke armed !) is similar to other armed forces budgets
which historically have been grossly underestimated and given that delivery is
at least 20 years away (longer than normal supplies) it is reasonable to expect that
the cost will likely be closer to $1 Trillion than $380 Billion ; that is if the deal ever
goes ahead.
IMO this AUKUS gig is code for Aus paying the US for protecting us against China with
a half dozen of their own existing Nuke Subs. This IMO could be Uncle Sam's variation
on his push to get Europe pay for US protection via NATO ...like hired Nukes!
- Forums
- Political Debate
- China is NOT our friend
Why personally attack the poster rather than addressing the...
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 29 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)
Featured News
Featured News
The Watchlist
I88
INFINI RESOURCES LIMITED
Charles Armstrong, CEO
Charles Armstrong
CEO
SPONSORED BY The Market Online