Australia's largest stock trading and investment forum Australia's #1 stock forum

because we all know you and the Frenchie are sinophiles, your...

First 49 Last

Share
Profile

Follow
Cowboyinvestor

19,106 Posts.

33

28/04/24

21:37

Post #: 73547419
Share

Originally posted by moorookamick: ↑

Why personally attack the poster rather than addressing the topic.

One has to conclude that you dont have a reasonable counter argument....eh?

IMO its reasonable to say that the projected $380 Billion for the Claytons Nuke Subs
(Nuclear propelled but not Nuke armed !) is similar to other armed forces budgets
which historically have been grossly underestimated and given that delivery is
at least 20 years away (longer than normal supplies) it is reasonable to expect that
the cost will likely be closer to $1 Trillion than $380 Billion ; that is if the deal ever
goes ahead.

IMO this AUKUS gig is code for Aus paying the US for protecting us against China with
a half dozen of their own existing Nuke Subs. This IMO could be Uncle Sam's variation
on his push to get Europe pay for US protection via NATO ...like hired Nukes!

Expand

because we all know you and the Frenchie are sinophiles, your comments don’t warrant time, they are devoid of reality

Last edited by Cowboyinvestor: 28/04/24
3 Upvote

Reply

There are more pages in this discussion • 28 more messages in this thread...

First 49 Last

SPONSORED BY