You have all missed the point. The Viet Namese did not have the...

You have all missed the point. The Viet Namese did not have the military might to defeat the US nor did the North in the Korean war which was actually the Chinese in North Korea. The Afghans did not have the same power as the Soviets nor do the Iraki insurgents today who they give all sorts of names to. The PLO do not have a nuclear arsenal nor an airforce which looks like a science fiction prop yet they have all managed to either gridlock their enemies or defeat them.

The Channel Nine News of Thursday carried a typical purchased piece of US propaganda which also went out on channel 9 and 10 saying the 1,000th US soldier was killed Iraq this week. helloo!!!

The same figure was carried in March of this year when other sources in the US put it then at 1,736 with 11,000 injured. And of the injured they were talking limbs and permanent or serious enough injury and not skin fractures.

Today the PBS network and the ABC in the US confirmed that 1,235 and 1,352 respectively were killed as of yesterday. The size of the budget matters not. Nor does the accuracy of the American news either.

What matters in my estimation and it will not stop is the fact that China today can manufacture anything and buy anything and move at will in any direction it wants. The balance of world powers is so precarious that they all need China. If the Indians can make a shirt at US$1 a piece which sells for US$20 in your shop rest assured the Chinese will mak it for US$70 cents by using its 11 million or so prisoners, indentureds, Triad captives and others. The west has no antidote to this. Immoral or not by anyones standards it will continue.

In China people are a dispensable commodity. Historicaly this has been the case. The Chinese do not have a problem because unlke the West they are not using someone else like the US with mexicans or the Israeli's with Arabs, or the Europeans with Africans. It therefore does not create an external enemy or potenial for the same.

If the Western companies in the advent of information age want to make money they must sell to China. And if you sell to 1% o the population you have it made. The risks are big too. But the Chinese will not stop.

Apart from IBM and Rover MG, it is rumoured and I have no reason to disbelieve it that Lockheed was offered to the Chinese. The civilian arm of the aircraft manufacturer. Then Boeing came for help when the giant Airbus and Airbus itself began taking business away from them. This of course was followed by Boeing losing uot on the new fighter aircraft. If not today then tomorrow. The Americans like Jonathan Pollard will sell their mothers if they were not so ugly. (Some are cute).

Believe me in the end the Chinese will not need to spend on R&D and will continue like they have in the past. The fact remains that the US will continue to R&D and dream up all sorts of Demons, but will not be able to sell where it matters. In this case the buyer is sovereign.

China will consume like it has elsewhere all the mining interests in Australia. The Japs are aware of it and are trying to make the most of the middle ground or be marginalised.

Australia has always been good to China. Thats not necessarily a sign of intelligence it is a sign of inevitability. If it is not John Howard it will be some one else.

The population here will grow like Mao said and this will be part of Nanyang (the south Seas or Greater China) after all. Look at the kids on TV and your kids on the street. The indelible stamp of Chinese blood on many kids in Australia is inescapable. Well what do you expect when the recent studiess by the family studies unit of some university (UNSW) discovered that of 200,000 Austrlaian families there is at least one child not of the spouse of the biological father of the others. And this is not the result of a second marriage but of deception by Australian women. Thats only part of the point.

There has been no greater fool than Howard to demonstrate his inability to strike a deal. The Chinese respect people who can deal even if they get the shorter end of the stick. Hawke was no better and neither was Keating. But Keating had a wider plan and was too engrossed in the feminist and other minority agendas.

See the Chinese do not rely on the monopoly of suffering and deaths in world war 2 like the Jews who raise t as a defence or a bargaining chip. They don't even mention it unless it is raised. The middle east where it matters respect the Chinese.The Chinese lost millions in that war as well and they are prepared to move forward inspite of it.

When you go to bed tonight remember that you are probably kept warm by a Chinese blanket after showering in a 85% Chinese built bath, dried with a Chinese linen towel and wearing Chinese made slippers. If you are too drunk it would not matter I suppose if the Wine actually came from the Barossa or Sinkiang.

Don't Ostritch yourself. Wake up and think. Phillip Ruddock let a lot more people in than you would care tobelieve. A Good Christian as the Evangelical channel said one morning at 5.00pm from Queensland whilst he stood on tehir stage. And the New Chinese migrants do joint the AOG churches because the benefits of networking are too good to miss.