Superninja,
I realize that new projects usually have issues when coming online (PLS proved this about a year ago with its tantalum project Tabba Tabba). But in your quote above, you claim that the above projects are all trying to resolve quality and quantity issues. I know what issues Mt Cattlin (not sure why you keep referring to them as Mt CAITLIN) have and also ORE, but I am not sure what quality and quantity issues you are referring to with Mt Marion.
You have mentioned many times before that Mt Marion have a high iron content. Yes it is higher than PLS, but presentations made by Chris Reed from NMT about Mt Marion has stated that these levels of iron at Mt Marion are within industry standards and will not be a problem. Joe Lowry has also stated this.
So I guess it cant be that. So what QUALITY and QUANTITY issues are you referring to at Mt Marion? Can you please state what they are and where you got your info from?
Cheers
- Forums
- ASX - By Stock
- PLS
- China Updates - More To Come
China Updates - More To Come, page-25
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 18 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)
Featured News
Add PLS (ASX) to my watchlist
|
|||||
Last
$2.67 |
Change
0.310(13.1%) |
Mkt cap ! $8.040B |
Open | High | Low | Value | Volume |
$2.55 | $2.77 | $2.53 | $172.5M | 64.79M |
Buyers (Bids)
No. | Vol. | Price($) |
---|---|---|
5 | 295865 | $2.66 |
Sellers (Offers)
Price($) | Vol. | No. |
---|---|---|
$2.67 | 2000 | 1 |
View Market Depth
No. | Vol. | Price($) |
---|---|---|
5 | 295865 | 2.660 |
11 | 285796 | 2.650 |
7 | 195605 | 2.640 |
1 | 5000 | 2.630 |
5 | 167434 | 2.620 |
Price($) | Vol. | No. |
---|---|---|
2.670 | 2000 | 1 |
2.680 | 348102 | 3 |
2.690 | 2112 | 3 |
2.700 | 202804 | 12 |
2.710 | 64522 | 10 |
Last trade - 16.10pm 11/09/2024 (20 minute delay) ? |
Featured News
PLS (ASX) Chart |