Australia's largest stock trading and investment forum Australia's #1 stock forum

I understand your point. But, one question, how come "toxic"...

First 27 Last

Share
Profile

Follow
zc920167

5 Posts.

11/10/19

11:30

Post #: 40833269
Share

Originally posted by Dipbuying: ↑

I make comment not against the Chinese people, whom a majority have probably benefited from the present regime. I have no doubt there are nice cities, impressive infrastructure and a flourishing culture. A lot to be proud of.

The comment is against the government, and its soft-power influence and toxic policies. You say the ends justifies the means, and come view the end product and don't worry about the means.

I say i will not and I'll fight against any occasion those toxic practices are projected outside of the Chinese mainland and i'll support any group who joins issue with those practices.

I wont be blinded to the struggle by bright lights and a modern economy.

Expand

I understand your point. But, one question, how come "toxic" policies/means can lead China to the second largest economy in the world?

Its easy for you to make comments on all those "means", but, at the end of day, the results also matter.

I dont intend to argue with you, I just want to point out two things for both of us to consider:
1. All those "toxic" means you think, are they really the way you see?
2. When it comes to political means, its always about how to align conflict of interests, majority vs minority, long term vs short term, ideal vs reality. So do you really understand all those factors before you call one policy "toxic"?
Upvote

Reply

There are more pages in this discussion • 20 more messages in this thread...

First 27 Last