IMO its deceptive to judge China's Governments (National , State...

  1. 23,927 Posts.
    lightbulb Created with Sketch. 770
    IMO its deceptive to judge China's Governments (National , State & Muni) debt
    in comparisonnto that of the USA or Aus for that matter is because
    33% of China's GDP is State owned capitalisn which means the value
    of SOEs should be deducted from China's gross debt while both the USA
    & Aus has very little SOEs (We sold ours & gold to defray debt in the 90s)

    "In 2017 total assets of all China's SOEs, including those operating in the financial sector, reached US$78.08 trillion"
    (source Wikipedia)

    Since that that SOE asset value has grown by at least 10%.

    This is a staggering amount of sovereign assets by global standards
    which makes Chinese soverign debt insignificant, IMO.

    https://hotcopper.com.au/data/attachments/6655/6655305-b7ccdeba954a780635c7b1a6220b575d.jpg


    So in summary, to use debt as a Chinese economic yardstick
    is deceptive without factoring-in the $85 Trillion USD value
    of China's SOEs. China's SOEs value dwarfs those considered
    with high SOE ownership like Singapore, Saudi Arabia & Narway.


    Last edited by moorookamick: 04/12/24
 
arrow-down-2 Created with Sketch. arrow-down-2 Created with Sketch.