CHK HWDD05, page-6

@Shikari

The claim was this: "AD-22 was the confirmation hole for BHP that oak dam west was copper rich IOCG country - this lead to subsequent bonanza drills AD23 and AD25 in close proximity."

I don't question AD22 intersected bornite in hematite altered granite.

The claim stated:

• "AD-22 was the confirmation hole for BHP that oak dam west was copper rich IOCG country" (AD-22 confirmed that they had bornite in hematite altered granite [= real deal], but it didn't confirm "oak dam west was copper rich IOCG country", one drill does not confirm a whole zone, that is mining 101).

• "this lead to subsequent bonanza drills AD23..." (it didn't as AD22 and AD23 were already planned, they didn't drill AD22 and then say to themselves 'hmm, we should drill another', AD23 was already planned.)

If you just had AD22 in isolation, that is not enough to confirm a mine or conclude that the whole zone is "rich IOCG country". That is illogical.