chm in trouble

Glyna

They proved that CHM cash got used

They proved MMX profited on a deal engineered by CHM directors - breach of fiduciary duties

They proved secret share issued to CHM directors in IO purchase

They proved CHM shares were issued for no reason to assist MMX

They are the bits I have heard about but I am sure there is more than this.

So what was MMX defence in all of this.

Oh sorry the witnesses there at the time didnt quite get to court to mount a defence.

The only witnesses MMX that were prepared to take the stand were paid witnesses trying to argue quantum and a forgetful chairman.

Give it up and wait for the judges decision