I think the normal expression is "think before you speak" -in every instance in this case the "security for costs" are paid by the the plaintiff (CHM) so that is simply maintaining the same methodology. the horrifying thing is that MMX are saying that their case relies solely on the evidence of Grimaldi and Barnes - if that is the case, and having some knowledge of these people, i would think on balance that MMX will go down
cheers
Add to My Watchlist
What is My Watchlist?
 (20min delay)
|
|||||
|
Last
0.5¢ |
Change
0.001(12.5%) |
Mkt cap ! $9.068M | |||
| Open | High | Low | Value | Volume |
| 0.5¢ | 0.5¢ | 0.5¢ | $2.418K | 526.2K |
Buyers (Bids)
| No. | Vol. | Price($) |
|---|---|---|
| 12 | 11217085 | 0.4¢ |
Sellers (Offers)
| Price($) | Vol. | No. |
|---|---|---|
| 0.5¢ | 15687025 | 18 |
View Market Depth
| Last trade - 15.52pm 01/07/2025 (20 minute delay) ? |
| CHM (ASX) Chart |