"He said no reasonable person watching the program would have interpreted an edited image with the caption "Chris 'Dogf***er' Kenny" to mean that Kenny really did have sex with a dog.
In the Supreme Court, Justice Robert Beech-Jones struck that part of the case out, but rejected the ABC's challenge to other elements."
Considering that part was struck out I don't really see what Kenny's case consists of. It just sounds like a giant waste of money of Kenny's behalf, so maybe you guys (and Tony) should be directing your money at him for wasting taxpayer's money.
chris kenny's defamation case against abc , page-4
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 80 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)