People have been saying it's a hedge against a crash since it listed. How is CI1 meant to capitalise on any crash when we have one small operation in Australia? That's a genuine question as CI1 said they planned to have insolvency practices across the country but instead we went down the BNPL route which has seen profits reduced and shareholders diluted and funds spent of purchases and aquisitions we're yet to get updates on years later. Plus out main source of revenue is the Hong Kong trustee side of things and Jim's new trustee fees have meant margins are squeezed and shareholders see less of the benefit. Not sure how CI1 is a hedge. How is Onestep IT or YOZO a hegde against a crash? And people have been calling a crash for years yet nothing. Porter you're sounding more and more like you work for Jim everyday. The reality is the stock will continue to fall or stay stagnant until Jim explains his 600% remumeration increase and why it came AFTER axing dividends and AFTER he and his wife sold millions of dollars worth of shates. Everything else you and others have said today is not new and people have been spouting the same stuff for years yet we're closer to record lows then we are highs.
- Forums
- ASX - By Stock
- CI1 General discussion
People have been saying it's a hedge against a crash since it...
-
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 898 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)
Featured News
Add CI1 (ASX) to my watchlist
(20min delay)
|
|||||
Last
11.0¢ |
Change
0.000(0.00%) |
Mkt cap ! $9.685M |
Open | High | Low | Value | Volume |
0.0¢ | 0.0¢ | 0.0¢ | $0 | 0 |
Featured News
CI1 (ASX) Chart |
Day chart unavailable