This is not an argument in defence of Hillary (believe that or...

  1. 24,610 Posts.
    lightbulb Created with Sketch. 8
    This is not an argument in defence of Hillary (believe that or not), simply an opinion that, as there have been no indictments, charges or convictions, all the above is opinion & speculation.

    That said, I'm not refuting your arguments or research, only awaiting a Judge to agree with you.

    From your other reply "actual evidence that these individuals mishandled classified information "

    "The State Department has discovered a dozen emails containing classified information that were sent to the personal email accounts of Colin L. Powell and close aides of Condoleezza Rice during their tenures as secretaries of state for President George W. Bush.

    Two emails were sent to Mr. Powell’s personal account, and 10 to personal accounts of Ms. Rice’s senior aides. Those emails have now been classified as “confidential” or “secret” as part of a review process that has resulted in similar “upgrades” of information sent through the personal email server that Hillary Clinton used while she was secretary of state from 2009 to 2013. The State Department did not say who sent the emails to Mr. Powell or to Ms. Rice’s aides, or who received the messages."

    http://www.nytimes.com/2016/02/05/u...kerry-condeleezza-rice-colin-powell.html?_r=0

    Yes, call the NYT a leftie or fake news site if you like but it's out there to be believed or not.
 
arrow-down-2 Created with Sketch. arrow-down-2 Created with Sketch.