Having a contrarian view just for the sake of it from someone who is ultra-contrarian is silly. Just how useful is the contrarian viewpoint anyway? Contrarian to who? A lot of mainstreamers regard gold as a bubble and it would seem the contrarians are the gold bugs. So is Skol a contrarian-contrarian? See how just saying you are the opposite to a mainstream view just for the sake of being the opposite is just plain silly but also hard to define?
However having balance is great when the arguments are good and well though out which we don't get from Skol.
There are homeopaths that are contrarian to medical science... Does that mean they are correct?
