Sevo provided factual information for all to discuss. He raised several important points, such as missing information and lack of imperitive test results. I don't think he was "warning" per say Sevo and at no stage said that receivership was a sure thing, nor did he go around thinking he was 100% certain (at the end of the day, no one can be). He was simply wanting to converse professionally with others in this open forum, and use his expert knowledge to perhaps challenge some of those less versed and their rose coloured glasses views. At the end of the day, Sevo is probably also learning like the rest of us.
It's unfortunate at the time that Sevo's generosity to share his invaluable knowledge was perceived by the likes of yourself as malicious and down ramping. I for one cherish people like Sevo since it allows people with less expertise to properly assess the risk of their assessments. Simple disregarding risk assessments for investments is done at owns own peril.
