Because they started without approvals?
Because they started before they had a DFS?
Because they started without a NT agreement?
Other lenders not interested because of the above?
Hard to say how much the approvals hurt them because their lack of success with the harvest was a death blow when added to the processing failure.
Something that other companies have spent 5-15 years trying to work out was always going to be high risk with the Apollo/Syme/Middlemas/Tony/swag of ex-FMG compressed approach.
They had advice on evaporation from Chile and advice on processing from Canada. What went wrong? Was it the advice or the interpretation?
Because they started without approvals?Because they started...
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 216 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)