Class Action/Lawsuit against SO4/Board, page-7

Just a suggestion. It is always difficult to prove statements are "misleading". It is comparatively easier to look at the issue using "continuous disclosure" and related obligation under ASX rules. I recall court cases based on fault with continuous disclosure had a better chance than trying to prove so and so made "misleading" statements because the blame can be pushed elsewhere. But this cannot be done with continuous disclosure it sits with the company as an entity listing on ASX.