This is just plain wrong.
If this were the case, GSW would have had to have made it clear that each and every single contract without exception is subject to 30 days trial. They may have said something slighly lighter once upon a time, but it is a company's duty to make that statement iron clad, and consistently - which was not the case.
Also, this the quote from the 2017 CBA agreement, and of course, quoted in both the ASIC and CA lawsuit.
"[Getswift] is pleased to announce it has entered in a n exclusive multi year partnership with Australia's leading financial institution Commonwealth Bank.....Getswift estimates the deal will result in over 257,400,000 deliveries on its platform over the next five years. with an estimated aggregated transaction value of over $9billion".
Once again, no mention of 30 free-trial, no mention of something like, "this agreement is subject to our terms outlined here XXXXX"
The agreement clearly outlines this is multi-year with an expected usage of 257M deliveries.
This is just one example.
Please stop trying to re-write history.
DYOR
- Forums
- ASX - By Stock
- Class Action
This is just plain wrong.If this were the case, GSW would have...
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 6 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)
Featured News
Add GSW (ASX) to my watchlist
Currently unlisted public company.
The Watchlist
1CG
ONE CLICK GROUP LIMITED
Mark Waller, MD
Mark Waller
MD
Previous Video
Next Video
SPONSORED BY The Market Online