The Hawaii Supreme Court found Skretting liable for the damage...

The Hawaii Supreme Court found Skretting liable for the damage to the fish in relation to the taurine defunct. But the peculiar USA economic loss rule caused the judges to err with the defendants because Keyhole did not imply there was damage to the property IE the fish. Keahole was implying the economic loss was the main stay of the action. It is complex USA law. Whereas Australia has a different view. See Perre V Apand for relevant case study to see how we do things.