It would be better if both sides of this thread, listened to the perfectly reasonable interview on CNN. Ignore the filtered news reports. And the CNN interviewer, for that matter.
Debate on the effects of man on climate, seems to have become a religous one. Where the "faith", of each end of the spectrum, demands exaggeration, hyperbole , and selective quoting of evidence.
Despite being aware of the dangers of man induced changes to the global climate , since about the middle 80's, and finding the evidence more and more compelling, I do so loath Christine Milne's pious bullshit, and her use of the same misleading tactics that the far right of the climate debate uses.
