Yes Eags, that's the spirit. You obviously think that the future of this country relies heavily on giving money away to people who earn up to $100k per annum. That is good policy in your narrow view.
Let me see, you want people earning $100k per annum to receive a cash bonus instead of fixing the public hospital crisis, paid maternity, significant R & D for green energy and the list goes on. I can't believe you actually think that this country is better off giving $1,900 to a couple earning $160,000 per year instead of a million other desperately needed issues requiring urgent attention in this country.
Well, at least it is good to see where you firmly stand on this issue. Stuff the hospitals, money for people earning up to 100K is far more important.
Talk about taxing everyone and giving to the non needy, great concept Eagle.
Not sure if this is true or not but I did hear that if you earn less than $26k you get nothing.......
- Forums
- Political Debate
- clear majority support rudds $42 bill package
clear majority support rudds $42 bill package, page-57
Featured News
Featured News
The Watchlist
BTH
BIGTINCAN HOLDINGS LIMITED
David Keane, Co-Founder & CEO
David Keane
Co-Founder & CEO
Previous Video
Next Video
SPONSORED BY The Market Online