Nothing silly about the article, you only have to read these threads to see the nutters that inhabit the deniers universe.
Without abuse warmists have nothing. Even the term "deniers" was coined because of it's abusive quality.
What is wrong with "sceptic" or "skeptic" if you must?
How about some science instead of editorial Redux? The IPCC Report for Policy Makers is not a scientific report and it was the only thing I recall being mentioned by warmies on HC in '13. It was a bad year.
