You have the right to your say, and you also have the right to...

You have the right to your say, and you also have the right to be wrong.

And currently you are wrong, and in denial of the current published and peer reviewed evidence in relation to A.G.W., as are the opponents of vaccination in relation to immunisation. So this is something you both have in common I guess.

You are welcome to refute the evidence of A.G.W., you can for example obtain funding from your Grand Wizard of Denial in Canberra perhaps, conjure up some data, or cherry pick and misconstrue someone else's data' and present it to be peer reviewed and published, who knows you might be famous ?.

Who cares about the so-called priests of warming or whatever, the evidence for A.G.W. is there in the published scientific literature, whether you like it or not.You can crap on all you like on these threads, the published science is still there until peer reviewed evidence says otherwise , and no matter what you or anyone says, mother nature will do as she wants anyway.

I mean all that money that the fossil fuel lobby, some $500M/year, throws around to try and discredit scientists, mashing up data and reports and publishing it on rubbish web-sites. If the fossil fuel lobbies are so certain of their claim that A.G.W. is a hoax, why don't they use that money to do there own research and publish in the respected scientific journals. Is it because they know that A.G.W. is a fact and they would be wasting their money ? Better to spread uncertainty instead and use gullible people to extend their profits for a little longer perhaps ?