climate change and my two cents, page-5

There should be, there needs to be - real debate.

http://www.washingtontimes.com/article/20071221/NATION/844993096/0/RSS_COMMENTARY

My question is: Why don't I see real debate in papers such as the Melbourne Age (supposedly a quality broadsheet)?

Reasonable people are supposed to be able to evaluate the relative merits of reasoned argument, but we are moving towards an environment where we are presented with what we ought to think.