climate change, page-68

  1. 6,029 Posts.
    lightbulb Created with Sketch. 2

    here's another one

    Tim Yeo 2009:

    “The dying gasps of the deniers will be put to bed. In five years time, no one will argue about a man-made contribution to climate change rofl

    Same person recently

    Tim Yeo 2013:

    [Telegraph, Matthew Holehouse]: “He (Yeo) insisted such action is “prudent” given the threat climate change poses to living standards worldwide. But, he said, human action is merely a “possible cause”.

    Asked on Tuesday night whether it was better to take action to mitigate the effects of climate change than to prevent it in the first place, he said: “The first thing to say is it does not represent any threat to the survival of the planet. None at all. The planet has survived much bigger changes than any climate change that is happening now.

    He went on: “Although I think the evidence that the climate is changing is now overwhelming, the causes are not absolutely clear. There could be natural causes, natural phases that are taking place.”

    Remember, this is what 90% certainty looks like. It looks like skeptics are winning.

    This is not just any old politician shifting gears. Yeo was named “Politician of the Year” at the inaugural 2011 Green Business Awards. James Delingpole pointed out that “Trougher” Yeo had other reasons for being so keen about environmental issues — thousands of other reasons. (Most of them, pounds sterling.) Not to mention that Yeo is Chairman of TMO Renewables, a biofuel company. Indeed, according to the Daily Mail in August 2012 other MPs wre pretty cheesed with the deal:

    Another greenie bites the dust

    more here

    http://joannenova.com.au/2013/05/tim-yeos-switches-from-deniers-last-gasp-to-warming-might-be-natural/#comments
 
arrow-down-2 Created with Sketch. arrow-down-2 Created with Sketch.